Sunday, April 10, 2016

Urban Redevelopment Pattern: A Study of Jadibuti Node

Urban area is more vibrant in terms of activities. Because of urbanization, cities having high population densities, there is busy life, heavy traffic movement on roads, polluted environment, people having packed schedule. 

To minimize the stress full life of city dwellers, it is necessary to have urban development in context with designs and physical infrastructure developments in Jadibuti to sustain itself in terms of node and towns.

Residential areas & the commercial centres are the primary focus of urban development. Urban development occurs by expansion into unpopulated areas and/or the renovation of decaying regions. 
Urban Development helps cities create sustainable mechanisms for future growth. Urban development in Jadibuti is the most necessary things now. Communication and social interaction among large numbers of people occur in development area. 

Their main role is being loci of socialization in the city and also they are the stages where alternative cultures perform in the public realm of the city. They are dynamic urban spaces which are always subjected to transformations of the city and its inhabitants.

Space created for use where people can enter for individual or public interests without social discrimination. If well organised, it will help to enhance cohesion of community life, positively change the public behavior, and increase the community awareness, promote individual identity and have a certain degree of local cultural meanings.

Urban development is often deemed a practice of expansion when cities spread into new areas. However, within a city itself, urban development takes on a different meaning. When compared with Jadibuti node, urban communities can appear to be the most developed in terms of commercial and business developments, open spaces, accessibility, city image and faster access to the latest technology. 

To study in detail please do refer:  
www.issuu.com/pokhrel 
*********************

BUDGETING

Budgets affect all of us. 

Businesses analyze budget policy in order to make investment decisions that impact on growth and employment. As citizens, we depend on the state to provide crucial services and infrastructure. 


Whether new roads will be built, whether children will have schools to go to or whether clinics can adequately cater for the health care needs of the population depends, to a large extent, on the way government raises revenues and allocates money to meet various competing and sometimes conflicting needs.


The budget is the most important economic policy tool of a government and provides a comprehensive statement of the priorities of a nation. 

As the representative institutions of the people, national legislatures are the appropriate place to ensure that the budget optimally matches a nation’s needs with available resources. 

Effective legislative participation in the budget process establishes checks and balances that are crucial for transparent and accountable government and ensuring efficient delivery of public services. 

Adequately cater for the health care needs of the population depends, to a large extent, on the way government raises revenues and allocates money to meet various competing and sometimes conflicting needs.


The budget is the most important economic policy tool of a government and provides a comprehensive statement of the priorities of a nation. As the representative institutions of the people, national legislatures are the appropriate place to ensure that the budget optimally matches a nation’s needs with available resources. 

Effective legislative participation in the budget process establishes checks and balances that are crucial for transparent and accountable government and ensuring efficient delivery of public services.


Governments are large and complex institutions, and this is reflected in their budgets. Measured in terms of revenues and numbers of employees, some national governments are among the biggest organizations in the world. 

This makes budgeting in the public sector inherently complex. Budget documents can comprise thousands of pages, the format of the budget is not always easily understandable, and thorough analysis can take a lot of time. Budget scrutiny can be a daunting challenge facing legislators when they are asked to consider the annual revenue and expenditure proposals of the government.


From a long-term perspective, the influence of national legislatures on budget policy has declined in many industrialized countries. It now appears, however, that many legislatures are rethinking their role in the budget process and reasserting themselves as more active players. 

Participatory Risk Assessment

The first step in the community risk assessment is hazard analysis. Hazards Analysis shows the potential impact of a hazard on a geographical area. It involves seeking relevant information upon all the hazards to which a community is exposed. Determinations of probability, magnitude and impact area can be made on the basis of historical evidence, empirical research or community perception.

Vulnerability assessment carries this exercise further by showing how civic infrastructure and population are likely to be affected by a hazard event. It is necessary to first identify physical vulnerabilities such as geographical remoteness of the community and its fragile location. An analysis of socio-economic vulnerability of the community shows the impact on people’s livelihood, income and consumption of the people. It explains the differential impact of a hazard on various groups such as the poor and low-income groups, workers in informal sector, women, elderly, ethnic or racial minorities. The VA would also analyze how schools, hospitals, roads and transport, electric and communication lines would be affected by a hazard event in a particular area. If we overlay these elements at risk on a hazard map, we get a full risk map of a particular area or locality.

Since vulnerability is related to capabilities and resources, it would be important to assess them at the level of individuals and organizations. Relevant information could be obtained upon natural and financial resources, skills, time, and material of individuals and communities. Similarly, strength of informal social networks and communications, and the community’s attitude towards risks and disasters influence community response, and thus provide relevant information for the assessment of community’s capabilities and resources.

VA stands Vulnerability Assessment.

Community Based Disaster Risk Management (DRM)

It is necessary that a community should understand the disaster risks to which they are exposed. The community needs to be well informed about the physical features of their location / settlement and the hazard events they are likely to experience. 

Such a social consciousness about disasters leads to building an organization / network within the community for risk reduction. It brings together the community around a common program. Such a program needs to have a clear set of objectives and outcomes. It must have well-defined activities, a plan for mobilizing community resources, and a strategy for making it sustainable.

Community programs focus on socio-economic vulnerability. They are meant to provide necessary resources to households and communities for better preparedness and mitigation. Though community programs include technical components, they avoid large-scale structural solutions such as embankments, levees and dykes. 

They pursue an inter-sectoral and multi-disciplinary approach such as water and soil conservation, livelihood and shelter programs for optimizing resources and providing sustainable solutions. 

Community programs tend to depend upon local knowledge, skills and capacities, which they can use for making necessary changes and adjustments in their living conditions and environment. Small in scale, most of these interventions are less expensive.

They need to involve community members in the entire cycle of disaster management- risk assessment, preparedness and mitigation, and response. Community participation in decision-making and implementation increases the program ownership and benefits and brings accountability.

Further, it needs to have an integrated approach under which pre-, during and post-disaster measures are planned and implemented as necessary by the community. 

Community based DRM includes, 


  • Applies local knowledge, skills and capacities.
  • Seek communities as active participant and decision makers,
  • Address different stages of disaster cycle: Prevention, preparedness and mitigation, and response and recovery.




Institutions for Risk and Financing Prevention

Risk Prevention 

We have paid considerable attention to the role of the public sector in disaster risk management. However, as with all development strategies, a multi-stakeholder approach that engages the community is most effective for disaster prevention.

Private enterprises could be recruited to sponsor mitigation measures in basic services. For example, the occurrence of flooding can be reduced by ensuring that flood plains are not built upon by private developers, protecting wetlands, and constructing levees along the river banks. 

Private and public measures need to work well together – for example, residents in low-lying areas of Jakarta raise the plinth of their houses to protect against floods; however, since public provision of piped water is inadequate, they also dig bore wells that causes the ground to subside. 

Research institutions can target public education about mitigation to low-income communities and creating positive incentives to encourage private sector and community participation. Community oversight can be crucial. Vibrant communities help ensure that trees are not thoughtlessly felled and that saplings will grow. Even if the interests of uplanders who cut the trees may diverge from lowlanders who get flooded, communities in dialogue bridge these differences and manage the fair use of the commons.

Further, the existence of institutionalized political parties is significantly associated with reductions in disaster mortality, since such systems are more likely to respond to citizen’s needs.

Financing Prevention

Just as prevention strategies are not obvious, finances for prevention are not obvious as well. It is important to recognize that the development goals of a country and the existing funds used to target the MDG build disaster resilience. Apart from the mainstream development funds, funds for disaster prevention are available for risk reduction in specific sectors. For example, the Climate Finance under the aegis of UNFCCC includes:
  • International Funds: Adaptation Fund, World Bank Carbon Partnership Facility for preparing CDM projects and monetizing CERs, Climate Investment Funds: The Clean Technology Fund for scaled up demonstration, deployment and transfer of low-carbon technologies, The Strategic Climate Fund for Climate Resilience in core development, Forest Investment Program, Program to Scale up Renewable Energy for Low Income Countries, urban planning support, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation programs (REDD+), GEF, GFDRR, International Development Association, IBRD, and CMDB.
  • Bilateral core funds for adaptation and mitigation.
  • National programs such as Hatoyama Initiative (Japan), International Climate Initiative (Germany).
  • Trust Funds and Partnerships, and Guarantees for knowledge products, capacity building, partial risk guarantees to support development, adoption and application of clean energy technologies.
  • Climate Insurance products for risk financing strategy development, MultiCat products, CAT swaps for extreme flood risks etc., and multi-city insurance products.
  • Climate Bonds against city CERs or Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action and monetizing carbon funds.
  • IFC and other MDB private sector arms for climate resilient infrastructure or low-carbon technologies. (Source"WB")

What is effective disaster prevention?

A successful policy response for effective prevention includes information, interventions and infrastructure. Underpinning this policy response is the role of institutions without which any policy response would be ineffectual. Pre-event risk management for natural disasters is a planned and structured approach that aims at:
  • Risk identification and assessment: identifying and prioritizing vulnerable areas and populations through advanced information systems,
  • Risk Control
  • Risk mitigation: reducing the intensity and frequency of the peril and the potential losses through interventions and infrastructure development, and
  • Risk transfer: transferring or spreading the risks through innovative institutions to lessen the burden on the victims and to facilitate the recovery process.
Risk identification and assessment is used to monitor risks and enhance early warning of impending disasters.
Risk Control measures comprise of mitigation and risk transfer. Mitigation or loss-reduction measures reduce the intensity of the hazard and/or its consequences. While mitigation is directed towards physical vulnerability, risk financing or risk transfer is directed towards financial vulnerability of governments, households or businesses. Risk financing measures reduce the losses incurred by a subject or entity by transferring risk or sharing losses with others.

Risk identification and assessment


Risk identification and assessments involves developing an inventory of historical hazard maps and producing hazard and vulnerability risk studies using Geo-spatial data. People are often guided in their prevention decisions by information on hazards. Making such maps easily accessible could make developers and property owners more aware of the risks and be motivated to build appropriately. It is relatively easy and effective for governments to make information about hazards and risks easily accessible, such as, maps of flood plains and seismic fault lines. Research institutions can also identify hazard-prone areas and the limitations on their use, and advise the government on land-use allocations and risks. Educational facilities can be used for monitoring the hazard identification systems.

Systematic mechanisms for tracking information related to the changing nature of risk, and translating it into risk-related property valuations, would go a long way to increase the incentives for prevention. Risk identification and assessments can also provide a strategic view of hazard exposure or contingent risk for the country as a whole or for different sectors. Risk evaluation needs to be strengthened at the municipal level and should be integrated into territorial development planning.

Challenges in Risk Identification & Assessment


We have already seen that systematic data collection on hazards is scant; where it is collected it is not shared; and there are no universal standards for defining hazards and related data.
On the other hand, open information on hazard risks also has unintended consequences. In an ideal world, when land and housing markets work, property values reflect hazard risks, guiding people’s decision on where to live and what prevention measures to take. 



Stages of Site Planning

Defining the problem

 Programming and the analysis of site and user

 Schematic design and the preliminary cost estimate

 Developed design and detailed costing

 Contract documents

 Bidding and contracting

 Construction

Occupation and management

Reciting these stages make them sound logical and linear, but the recital is only conventional; the real process is looping and cyclical. Knowledge of a later phase influences conduct of an earlier one, and early decisions are later re-worked. Site design is a process of learning in which a coherent system of form, client, program, and site gradually emerges. Even after decisions are made and building begins- even after the site is occupied-the feedback from experiences continues to modify the plan.

"Combating Urban Governance in current context"

“Urban Governance (and decentralization) is an enabling framework to fight against inequalities and poverty to achieve the Millennium development goals and for the economic, social and cultural development of the society, country and most important the human rights of the different societies. 

Rapid urbanization, the scarcity of suitable jobs and the short comings of city planning and management are some of the causes behind the urbanization (slums and squatter relating directly) of poverty in one sense whereas in the terms of less development, poor mobilization, scarcity of food and weak local government is the biggest challenges in this today’s world perspective. 

Urban growth is potentially positive if it brings sufficient economic empowerment to generate the employment and revenues needed as well as food security for the future purpose and the present scenario lack on these issues as well. The people living in the world with seven billion population shows that there will be crisis relating to the food and agriculture.

People day by day eradicating the greenery lands and converting the lands into their benefits and use ;which one day surely the world will be in a great threat from the environmental problems as people are in the mood to destroy the greenery land into their desired concrete jungles for living use. Environmental degradation leads to explicit of the preservation which is causing a problem for other living being in the jungles, forest and loss of bio-aquatic life due to pollution caused by the industries and people living in the societies as well. 

Without the positive outcomes, cities are increasingly segregated into under equipped and residential neighborhoods where social and spatial divides are mutually reinforced. The difficulties of accessing the private and public lands, essential and emergency services with the basic provision of living and housing is one of the most aspect of living in the cruel societies. However, in context of Nepal, being on the South-east Asia, facing difficulties in accessing the land for shelter and farming is one of the cases for poverty and poor. 

Human poverty is reflected by the growing number of slums and squatters in many urban agglomerations. It is the most important that the basic provision of services which is adapted through the cultural practices and in the terms of technical and financial capacities of populations, and that they be based on national sector polices as well. 

The government led only when it has a balance policies and which have a address of problem till tomorrow at least 30 years. But in context of Nepal, we lack strong policies relating to foreign affairs, industrial and labor policies with other policies need to be addressed as soon as possible. 

In Nepal, the services are delivered and managed to co-production but having with difficulties due to corruption. The policies are biased in one way and in some cases, different political parties has different meaning on policies too which is the main current problem in Nepal not to progress and in Nepal, most part of the departments is in corruption way which led to failure of economic as well as social morals which we underdeveloped countries have to face in daily lives. 

The involvement of local authorities in corruption has led the failure of industries and government agencies. For example Nepal Airlines, Janakpur cigarette factory and other government based industries, corporation were ruined by the government officials to failure the public facilities for the sake of private sectors development. 

The revenue structure is different in people business. Many top companies are not in adopting revenues policies and have a culprit by making duplicate revenue bills to failure the economic status of the country itself and our government not taking action but in the mood to protect the industries due to corruption terms. The public sector few officials has declared some terms in adhoc basis which don’t put efforts on developing the nation but ruining the images of the country. 

The adhoc rules and regulation made suffer to the people in policies development. People want favorable policies in Nepal as well as constitution too, which can be a big trauma to all the citizens living in Nepal.

The centralization government should be decentralize and work on broad regional levels for access to basic services for all. The aim of decentralization can help national and local authorities implement reforms promoting access to these services for all as education, empowerment and capacity building. 

We most foster dissemination particularly within the network of cooperation and governmental supports in the implementation by involving the local and regional authorities to establish for the development of the different societies in infrastructure development, education and health sectors with empowerment in the local and regional based societies. 

Civil society and the private sector by ensuring their surrounding environmental impact is managed. In terms of the political level, and their particularly regarding national level recognition of the fundamental principles for access to the essential services which can lead to the development of the social form. 

Due to political unrest, many people still shifting from one place to another place for safer environment to live and sustain their lives for children and family. The ongoing constitution process is also a lead to balance of societies through equal access provision. However, the situation is not favorable without clear vision to develop Nepal and its internal structures. 

The traditional based societies have different tribe living together with culture, religion and beliefs with mixture of people living in the same place with social vibrancy and social harmony. The failure to address the current demand can lead to failure of governance and can lead back to the bloodshed which is the biggest issues in this context. Political failure has created economical exploitation and close of industries in different region which leads to shift of industries into another region which can also become a region of decline of cities and villages in the living area. 

In terms of Governance, delivering basic services helps initial change in the way in where the organizations, institutions are run combined with the learning effect as well. There is a high potential for progress in the way these services are managed, particularly, energy and water supply, natural resources, public facilities like roads, and public transport. 

In Nepal the government is playing its role in tortoise manner as to play a long-term in -building the capacities of municipalities and all actors to streamline the provision of services and improve the rural and urban efficiency.

Remedies for Traffic Congestion

There are various methods to control the traffic congestion. However, it depends upon the growth of the cities.

  1. Providing different roads or routes for different types of traffic.
  2.  Providing the movements of vehicles by making one-way traffic.
  3. Creating car parks and bike parks or side-bays at convenient places along the road.
  4. Providing terminal bus stops.
  5. Providing parking places in the shopping, commercial and recreational centre.
  6.  Providing incentives to the landowners so that the nearby land can be used for parking.

Featured post

Achievements/ Recognition of the Hard work

"Education and Skills" M.Sc . Urban Design and Conservation   (Master's Thesis: Urban Design and Pedestrian Behavior) ...